Intangible Risk?
@incollection{hansen2005intangible,
title={Intangible Risk},
author={Hansen, Lars Peter and Heaton, John C and Li, Nan},
booktitle={Measuring Capital in the New Economy},
pages={111--152},
year={2005},
publisher={University of Chicago Press}
}
✕ Robust Control of Forward Looking Models
This paper shows how to formulate and compute robust Ramsey (aka Stackelberg) plans for linear models with forward-looking private agents. The leaders and the followers share a common approximating model and both have preferences for robust decision rules because both doubt the model. Since their preferences differ, the leader’s and followers’ define a Stackelberg equilibrium with robust decision makers in which the leader and follower have different worst-case models despite sharing a common approximating model. To compute a Stackelberg equilibrium we formulate a Bellman equation that is associated with an artificial single-agent robust control problem. The artificial Bellman equation contains a description of implementability constraints that include Euler equations that describe the worst-case analysis of the followers. As an example, the paper analyzes a model of a monopoly facing a competitive fringe.
@article{hansen:2003robust,
title={Robust Control of Forward-Looking Models},
author={Hansen, Lars Peter and Sargent, Thomas J.},
journal={Journal of Monetary Economics},
volume={50},
number={3},
pages={581--604},
year={2003},
publisher={Elsevier}
}
✕ A Quartet of Semigroups for Model Specification, Robustness, Prices of Risk and Model Detection
A representative agent fears that his model, a continuous time Markov process with jump and diffusion components, is misspecified and therefore uses robust control theory to make decisions. Under the decision maker’s approximating model, cautious behavior puts adjustments for model misspecification into market prices for risk factors. We use a statistical theory of detection to quantify how much model misspecification the decision maker should fear, given his historical data record. A semigroup is a collection of objects connected by something like the law of iterated expectations. The law of iterated expectations defines the semigroup for a Markov process, while similar laws define other semigroups. Related semigroups describe (1) an approximating model; (2) a model misspecification adjustment to the continuation value in the decision maker’s Bellman equation; (3) asset prices; and (4) the behavior of the model detection statistics that we use to calibrate how much robustness the decision maker prefers. Semigroups 2, 3, and 4 establish a tight link between the market price of uncertainty and a bound on the error in statistically discriminating between an approximating and a worst case model.
@article{anderson2003quartet,
title={A quartet of Semigroups for Model Specification, Robustness, Prices of Risk, and Model Detection},
author={Anderson, Evan W and Hansen, Lars Peter and Sargent, Thomas J},
journal={Journal of the European Economic Association},
volume={1},
number={1},
pages={68--123},
year={2003},
publisher={Wiley Online Library}
}
✕ Robust Permanent Income and Pricing with Filtering
A planner and agent in a permanent-income economy cannot observe part of the state, regard their model as an approximation, and value decision rules that are robust across a set of models. They use robust decision theory to choose allocations. Equilibrium prices reflect the preference for robustness and so embody a “market price of Knightian uncertainty.” We compute market prices of risk and compare them with a model that assumes that the state is fully observed. We use detection error probabilities to constrain a single parameter that governs the taste for robustness.
@article{hsw:2002,
title={Robust Permanent Income and Pricing with Filtering},
author={Hansen, Lars Peter and Sargent, Thomas J. and Wang, Neng E},
journal={Macroeconomic Dynamics},
volume={6},
number={01},
pages={40–84},
year={2002},
publisher={Cambridge Univ Press}
}
✕Robustness and Pricing with Uncertain Growth
We study how decision-makers’ concerns about robustness affect prices and quantities in a stochastic growth model. In the model economy, growth rates in technology are altered by infrequent large shocks and continuous small shocks. An investor observes movements in the technology level but cannot perfectly distinguish their sources. Instead the investor solves a signal extraction problem. We depart from most of the macroeconomics and finance literature by presuming that the investor treats the specification of technology evolution as an approximation. To promote a decision rule that is robust to model misspecification, an investor acts as if a malevolent player threatens to perturb the actual data-generating process relative to his approximating model. We study how a concern about robustness alters asset prices. We show that the dynamic evolution of the risk-return trade-off is dominated by movements in the growth-state probabilities and that the evolution of the dividend-price ratio is driven primarily by the capital-technology ratio.
@article{chsw:2002,
title={Robustness and Pricing With Uncertain Growth},
author={Cagetti, Marco and Hansen, Lars Peter and Sargent, Thomas and Williams, Noah},
journal={Review of Financial Studies},
volume={15},
number={2},
pages={363--404},
year={2002},
publisher={Soc Financial Studies}
}
✕ Generalized Method of Moments Estimation: A Time Series Perspective (published title “Method of Moments”)
This entry describes empirical methods for estimating dynamic economic systems using time-series data. By design, the methods target specific feature of the dynamic system and do not require a complete specification of the time-series evolution. The resulting generalized-method-of-moments estimation and inference methods use estimating equations implied by some components of a dynamic economic system. This entry describes the statistical methods and some applications of these methods.
@article{hansen2001generalized,
title={Generalized Method of Moments Estimation: A Time Series Perspective},
author={Hansen, Lars Peter},
journal={International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences},
year={2001}
}
✕ Robust Control and Model Uncertainty
@article{hansensargent:2001,
Author = {Hansen, Lars Peter and Sargent, Thomas J.},
Date-Added = {2014-12-29 19:53:18 +0000},
Date-Modified = {2014-12-29 19:53:18 +0000},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Month = {May},
Number = {2},
Pages = {60-66},
Title = {Robust Control and Model Uncertainty},
Volume = {91},
Year = {2001}}
Acknowledging Misspecification in Macroeconomic Theory
We explore methods for confronting model misspecification in macroeconomics. We construct dynamic equilibria in which private agents and policy makers recognize that models are approximations. We explore two generalizations of rational expectations equilibria. In one of these equilibria, decision makers use dynamic evolution equations that are imperfect statistical approximations, and in the other misspecification is impossible to detect even from infinite samples of time-series data. In the first of these equilibria, decision rules are tailored to be robust to the allowable statistical dis- crepancies. Using frequency domain methods, we show that robust decision makers treat model misspecification like time-series econometricians.
@article{hansensargent:2001,
title={Acknowledging Misspecification in Macroeconomic Theory},
author={Hansen, Lars Peter and Sargent, Thomas J},
journal={Review of Economic Dynamics},
volume={4},
number={3},
pages={519--535},
year={2001},
publisher={Elsevier}
}
✕ An Appreciation of A.W. Phillips
A way to honor A. W. Phillips is to describe the continuing influence of one of his enduring contributions to economic dynamics, his remarkable 1959 Biometrika paper about how discrete time observations can be used to restrict a continuous time linear model. That paper precisely described what later came to be known as the problem of `aggregation over time,’ set forth a framework for studying it, and achieved useful characterizations of it. Phillips’s 1959 paper partly shared the destiny of John F. Muth’s two 1960 and 1961 papers about rational expectations. It took years for other economists to recognize how much more could be done with their ideas. In 1960, both Phillips and Muth were far ahead of most other economists in their understanding of the technicalities of time series analysis, and their appreciation for its potential applications to economic dynamics.
@article{hansen:1995appreciation,
title={An Appreciation of AW Phillips},
author={Hansen, Lars P and Sargent, Thomas J},
year={1995},
publisher={Citeseer}
}
✕ Robust Permanent Income and Pricing
“… I suppose there exists an extremely powerful, and, if I may so speak, malignant being, whose whole endeavours are directed toward deceiving me.” Rene Descartes, Meditations, II.
@article{hansen1999robust,
title={Robust Permanent Income and Pricing},
author={Hansen, Lars Peter and Sargent, Thomas J and Tallarini, Thomas D and others},
journal={Review of Economic studies},
volume={66},
number={4},
pages={873--907},
year={1999}
}
✕